abs (1) adrenal fatigue (1) Alli McKee (2) Alvin Pearman (1) Apolo Ohno (1) athlete (1) Axiom Fitness (1) Bagels (1) Barbara Mencer (1) Black Friday (1) body fat (12) bodybuilding (1) book (1) boot camp (2) Breads (1) breakfast (1) Brendan Foley (2) Brock Lesnar (1) business (1) cable bands (1) Carb Backloading (1) carb load (1) carbs (5) cardio (5) carnivore (1) Charleston (1) Circuit (2) College (3) Common (1) complex carbs (2) core (1) cortisol (1) Craig Ballantyne (3) Creative Loafing (1) CrossFit (17) Dana Sorensen (1) David Goggins (1) Davidson (2) defeat (1) Demi Goodman (2) diet (24) Diet & Nutrition (20) Ellen DeGeneres (1) endurance (4) energy levels (2) Erin Stern (1) fasting (1) fat loss (3) female (2) Fight Gone Bad (1) figure competitor (1) Fitness Spotlight - Men (8) Fitness Spotlight - Women (16) flexible (1) football (2) fruits (1) Georges St. Pierre (3) glycogen (1) GPP (1) grains (4) Grant Hill (1) Green (3) Green Monster (1) Greens (1) Greg Plitt (1) half-marathon (3) heart rate (2) Heather Mitts (2) herbivore (1) hotel (1) improvement (2) injury (2) inspiration (2) insulin (1) Intermittent Fasting (2) Intervals (7) interview (9) Ironman (2) Jade Teta (1) Jake Shields (1) Jamin Thompson (3) Jessica Biel (1) Jill Coleman (1) Julia Mancuso (1) junk food (1) Kelly Fillnow (1) Laura Gainor (1) Lolo Jones (1) Lust List (1) Lyndsay Braswell (2) magazine (1) Mark Sisson (2) marketing (1) Martin Berkhan (1) Max Wettstein (1) Metro Dash (1) Milwaukee (2) Miranda Olydroyd (1) MMA (2) model (4) motivation (4) muscle (1) Myrtle Beach (1) Navy SEAL (1) NBA (2) NFL (1) Nick Tumminello (1) Nike (2) nutrition (7) oatmeal (1) Olympics (4) organic (1) overtraining (1) P90X (1) Paleo (4) Personal Trainer (3) Philip Ciccarello (3) Phillipe Nover (1) Phoenix Suns (1) photo (1) plyos (3) post-workout (1) pregnancy (1) Preston Thomas (1) Processed (1) protein (2) Rachel Elizabeth Murray (1) Raw Food (1) receipes (1) Rich Froning (1) Rob Riches (1) Robert Cheeke (1) rope climbs (1) running (4) Sarah Rippel (1) Scivation (1) Sebastian Ekberg (1) shake (2) shoes (2) six-pack (4) Smoothie (3) softball (1) Spinach (3) sprints (2) Steve Nash (2) stress (1) sugar (2) Tabata (4) tattoo (1) Thanksgiving (1) The Rock (2) time management (1) Tony Gonzalez (2) track & field (5) training (7) Training & Workouts (18) transformation (5) travel (1) Triathlon (1) ttime management (1) Twitter (10) UFC (3) Under Armour (4) University (1) vegan (4) Vegetables (4) vegetarian (3) video (21) walking (1) Warm-up (1) weight loss (13) weightloss (1) women (2) YouTube (1)
Powered by Squarespace
« Should I stretch before I workout? | Main | Fitness Spotlight - KathEats.com »
Sunday
Jan242010

Nike vs Under Armour

After group fitness class one day, someone asked me if I had a contract with Under Armour.  Much of my workout gear is from Under Armour, so I assume this is what sparked the question.  My answer was "No, unfortunately" since I am no where close to a fitness model or famous enough to get paid for wearing a specific brand of athletic apparel.  The question sparked a longer conversation between us that eventually landed on the debate of "are you a Nike person or an Under Armour person?"  I thought I would follow up that debate with some informal analysis here.

 

 

 As most know, Nike became famous for being a basketball brand thanks in large part to Air Jordan, and continued today thanks to LeBron and Kobe.  Not many are aware though that Nike originated as a running shoe brand, which is part of the reason they are still prevalent in the track & field market.

  Under Armour basically originated the "dry fit"-style football undershirt, but has clearly branched out into so much more these days thanks to the launch of their running shoe line, and continued branch out into nearly all forms of athletic apparel.

Nike holds a solid presence in football, featured by their Pro Combat line.  I was actually a Nike-guy my entire football life, I never wore anything other than Nike cleats, and that is despite playing for a school with a two-year contract with Reebok until I was a junior.

Under Armour has not yet penetrated the football cleat market as deeply as Nike, but their apparel is closing fast.  They have also been smart to go after the youth/high-school market with their name-sponsored high school football All-American game being one example.  Nike has attempted to counter this with their SPARQ training brand.  

Moving strictly to observations (and admittedly this sample size is limited to what I see at my gym each day or runners I notice while driving down the street) it seems as though Nike is somewhat more popular in the female demographic as it relates to runners.  I've been told their running/fitness apparel is "cute" by lots of women, whereas the options are somewhat more limited for men.  Both genders have great shoe options, however as it relates to apparel, Nike seems to put more of its efforts behind the basketball market (another comparison would be how Adidas directs most of its apparel towards the soccer market).

 While I played football (and high school basketball) in nothing but Nikes, I'm strictly an Under Armour shoe person for running and workouts.  Saucony is an outlier since I do have a couple pairs of their running shoes, but I don't want to stray from the main two focuses of this debate.  When Under Armour launched their running shoe line in January of 2009, I picked up a pair and was blown away with how good they were.  It seems as though the general public consensus is that they are solid shoes, which goes to show that as important as fashion may be, quality always wins when it comes to athletic footwear.

I should also say that I had the chance to meet and workout with Team USA Women's Soccer Olympian (and Under Armour endorser) Heather Mitts recently, who told me Under Armour running shoes were "by far" the best shoe she has ever worn for serious runners and athletes.  I was already wearing UA shoes at the time, so I don't think she was trying to "sell" me. 

I'm not sure what degree of market-share UA may have claimed from Nike since they dove into the footwear and overall athletic apparel battle.  You'd probably have to check with people like CNBC's Darren Rovell (Twitter: @darrenrovell1) or Brian Gainor of www.PartnershipActivation.com (Twitter: @briangainor). 

My .02 cents: Nike is still the king of sports apparel and footwear since Under Armour truly only goes head-to-head in football, lacrosse, softball, and a few other olympic sports contested on the high school level.  Nike largely runs unopposed in basketball, golf, track & field, and a few others.

With that said, it is a testament to Under Armour's tremendous products, sharp marketing, and well-thought-out business plan that they have been able to make up so much ground in a relatively small amount of time.

*Hopefully this is the first installment of these, I welcome comments and feedback on your own Nike/UA product experiences.

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: Buty Nike
    TheFitnessChamp.com - Home - Nike vs Under Armour
  • Response
    TheFitnessChamp.com - Home - Nike vs Under Armour
  • Response
    Response: Safer Colon
    TheFitnessChamp.com - Home - Nike vs Under Armour
  • Response
    Response: bodybuilding
    TheFitnessChamp.com - Home - Nike vs Under Armour

Reader Comments (4)

I find this article amusing since I learned the difference between the two.I can see that both have its own advantage and disadvantages.All in all, both are amazing brands.

Jessica Star
Designer Sale

May 17, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterJessica Star

Nice one..
I am a big fan of Nike shoes mart and I love to visit their shop at least ones in a month. There are one more shop named Niceshoemart which I prefer for accessories and shoes.

May 19, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMike

I have to say that I like both but if I was sitting at store with the chose of picking clothing from Nike or Under Armour, I would probably go for Nike as it seems to me that Under Armour is more expense and the quality is about the same. You can pick your favorite at our site. http://www.brandcrown.com/brandBattle/1532/Under-Armour-VS-Nike

January 26, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterBrand Crown

I have usually preferred Under Armour to Nike. I just find a lot of Nike's apparel to be cheaper in quality compared to Under Armour. Going to Maryland (Under Armour University basically) has only increased this. Oddly enough I'm wearing all UA products will typing this. They sign more and more teams every year for college athletics. In football, they just signed Northwestern, meaning they now have at least 1 Under Armour school in every BCS conference. In the bowl season, the teams that were equipped with Under Armour went 5-0 (5-1 if you count Northwestern, who didn't sign until after the game and wore Adidas before signing). Just looking at the schools and the results these teams get while wearing the apparel shows that there truly is a performance advantage to Under Armour over Nike.

March 1, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterreborn579

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>